Home loans refinancing
60Home loan refinancing
Refinancing a home loan has become increasingly difficult of late, for a number of interconnected reasons, not least of which is the fact that the banks do not actually have any money. The several trillion dollars pumped into the banking system by the US government seems to have mysteriously disappeared down a black hole in Dubai.
Despite what your politicians may be telling you, the money pumped in was not to provide loans to homeowners in need, it was to prevent the financial system from collapsing completely and much of it has vanished in the form of kick-backs, commissions paid and staggering bonus and pension payments to bank CEOs.
The dribble-down effect of these vanishing monies will take years to have an effect further down the food chain, so do not expect things to improve overnight. Best case scenario – you are going to need at least 25% equity in your home to refinance a loan against it and with home prices in the US down to 2003 levels already, there are not many people who need refinancing with this much equity so that means finding cash. Yes – cash – there does not seem to be a lot of that around unless you are a merchant banker, but anyone who wishes to refinance a home loan is going to need some.
The big issue at the moment is the amount of people who were persuaded to accept adjustable rate mortgages (ARMS) on the understanding that in the beginning there would be a low introductory interest rate and later in the loan’s life, the rate would rise. At which time, the various banks, salesmen and mortgage “advisors” assured them, they would be able to re-finance using another adjustable rate mortgage. Oops. Hello financial crisis – goodbye remortgaging in this way.
We are now faced with a situation whereby one in eight mortgage holders in the US are delinquent on their mortgage payments and the amount of foreclosed homes is staggering. Although the governments Inc (and this issue is by no means exclusive to the USA) are quite happy to socialize the banking losses, they do not appear quite so keen to socialize the assets and there are vast numbers of government or bank-owned homes sitting around rotting all over the world. In Spain, for example, the banks have now become the largest property owners in the country. Untold thousands of homes have been seized and are being held back from the market in an attempt to prevent house prices from collapsing completely. With official government figures showing unemployment in Spain at 17.4% it is difficult to gauge what the long term effects will be, but the European Central Bank printed 60 billion euros of new money and pumped it into Spain a few months ago – and this was not reported by any major European news sources.
Which brings us back to the issues facing people in need of refinancing with bad credit who are also facing the prospect of losing a home to foreclosure. The mortgage rates for refinancing for those in this situation will be even worse than those with acceptable credit ratings. Posting the keys to the property back to the mortgage company, finding rented accommodation somewhere and simply walking away is becoming a solution many are taking. This is not without it’s problems, and if I know one thing it is that a bank will never walk away from an uncollected debt. The recent government initiates to help consumers in this situation are at best mis-guided and at worst, a deliberate attempt on the part of the government to persuade you there is help available when there is not.
Realistically, if you are in this position – you are on your own and
the only two options are to either walk or find the money to pay. There
are no easy options here at the moment and I am firmly of the opinion
that we will be returning to more rational lending practices for the
foreseeable future. The housing bubble which was created to lessen the
effects of the dot com bubble must be allowed to deflate and the
inflationary bubble the governments are producing by printing extra
money and allowing the banking institutions to revalue their assets is
not going to work. Economist LudwigVon Mises said it best: “There is
no escape from a credit induced bubble.”
Unfortunately, the government interference means the bubble is not
deflating evenly and some parts of the economy are being artificially
prevented from correcting – the big fear as far as I am concerned is
the creation of a “government bubble,” where all the housing stock, all
the jobs and all the production are government owned. We already have
governments basically running or owning the banks, the insurance
companies, the car makers and much of the housing stock thus eventually
property developers. There really will be no escape from the government
bubble that does not involve bloodshed or at worst an Orwellian 1984
situation.
CommentsLoading...
I am glad I signed a fixed rate mortgage, even though it is at 6.75%. This is also my first home purchase so this kind of situation makes me worry about the future. Is there an end in sight and when that end comes, will I still make a profit from the sale?
I am a loan originator and it is disgusting what is happening to this industry. The government has yet to provide a viable solution to the mess they created. Then you have the addition secondary overlays from investors that are not allowing people that really need to take advantage of these low rates.
What can I say---greed continues to run the business and financial world…
Mark i work in a hotel.Last year i was coperating also with the best Greek bank in hone loans,about 6 months i was making more money from my steady job.But after last september it becames my grave,i believed so much in this job,nothing man nothing,even a cent after the disaster,Now i can not even pay home bills,i feel totally dead financially.
Very well said! I applaud you. So many are getting caught in this. I have to ask you this - Would it help in the long run if banks put aside their "business" hats and actually considered working along side the homeowners? I mean if I had lost my job and was unable to pay $800 in mortgage a month in my new job but could pay $500. Why can't the banks work with them instead of foreclosing and sitting on a piece of property with NO income coming in at all.












BrianS 2 years ago
This is a subject I have become pretty interested in, I have looked at Obama's make homes affordable package and it's predecessor Hope for Homeowners that came in under the Bush administration and have to admit the Hope for Homeowners seemed like a more sensible solution to me, mainly because it was less of a giveaway and people have to share the future equity in their home if and when things get better. But that was before you said all the cash was gone anyway in which case it all becomes a bit academic.